In today’s Rzeczpospolita, Dr. Michal Markiewicz writes about the work contract and the “strange” rulings limiting its application to the intangible effects of these contracts. Despite the fact that the Supreme Court clearly indicates that the same effect can be the result of both a contract for work and a contract for services, and it is up to the parties to the contract to decide how they want to shape their relationship, still some courts, including the Supreme Administrative Court, introduce surprising requirements to some subjects of such contracts. 👉 So how to draw the correct line between a contract for work and a contract for the provision of services, and how to reconcile the conflicting rulings of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court? ➡️ Publicly available excerpt from the article: https://archiwum.rp.pl/artykul/1506745.html
